Ahh, a mass of posts all in one day, after not posting for a year or so. Yeah, that’s how I roll.
Me, the Twit – Day 1 has now just about come to an end. I’ve done some digging, found some info on how it makes sense as a social tool, how it can be used academically, and why it isn’t as stupid as it looks. (Ha!)
My own limited experience with it started with "following" a bald guy I know, and evolved to:
- finding comments from people all over the world who attended a music festival I went to this weekend
- finding comments from people who mention Ryerson (but not always the U)
- finding comments from people who mention a band I like (listening to, excited to see upcoming concert by, just bought CD of, here’s a new video clip of…)
- finding people who are following people who are following people I know
- finding supposed celebrity Twitterers, but still not feeling like following them
I now have 2 followers, one of which is probably some spammer (since I have NO idea who this person is). I still have to wrap my head around a bunch of it, though, because it’s evolving into something I didn’t expect. Although I suspected that may be the case. (double HA!)
Below are a few collected resources and articles that I found compelling, in my search for the twit-truth. Enjoy!
A Bunch of Twits…
… and before this gets lost in the mess below, there is actually a way to create a private group Twitter, via http://grouptweet.com/
This sounds perfect for course use! Any Rye faculty out there want to try it out with one of their classes?
While I obviously spend a great deal of time online and thinking about the potential of these new networked digital communication structures, I also worry about the way that they too easily lead to increasingly short space and time for conversation, cutting off nuance and conversation, and what is often worse how these conversations often reduce to self-centered statements.
How Twitter Creates a Social 6th Sense
Critics sneer at Twitter and Dodgeball as hipster narcissism, but the real appeal of Twitter is almost the inverse of narcissism. It’s practically collectivist — you’re creating a shared understanding larger than yourself.
My tribe is not your tribe because you’re not using Twitter how I do. You wrote an Academy Award-winning screenplay, only follow a few people, but have thousands following you. You sell shoes and follow each of the thousands of people who follow you. You are a major airline, but sound surprisingly human.
Twitter’s value has nothing to do with the technology.
Contribute to: Twitter for Teachers
Private Members Only
I also feel that I have to make mention of the privacy issue here… I know, it feels like the biggest ball & chain on the leg of creativity, but it’s important to keep it in mind. Twitter is a public service, and probably has servers housed in the U.S. Due to the Patriot Act, your information (user info, what you say, when you said it, who you communicate with – EVERYTHING) can be accessed by the U.S. gov’t. This is against Canadian policy, and certainly against the policies that we try to adhere to at Ryerson. I’m no expert in such privacy and legal matters, but it’s important that any users (faculty, students, TAs) being asked to use these systems for class work have some understanding before signing up.